Hindustan Zinc receives its first European patent

The patent EP3192882 granted in July 31, 2019 discloses method of production of Potassium Antimony Tartrate (PAT) by utlizing waste products bearing antimony. Potassium Antimony Tartrate (PAT) is consumed by Zinc hydro smelters for purification of Zinc Sulphate solution to produce Zinc metal. The USA and India equivalents of this patent are under processing. The patented process has been commercialized and is running successfully at […]

Patent infringement actions are maintainable only in respect of granted and live patents

On Aug. 20, 2019, High Court of Delhi Passed order that “Patent infringement actions are maintainable only in respect of granted and live patents.” Plaintiff: Novartis AG & ANR.      . Defendant: Natco Pharma Ltd. The suit concerns the Plaintiff’s patent number IN 276026 titled ‘Novel Pyrimidine Compounds and Compositions as Protein Kinase Inhibitors” relating Ceritinib drug for treating non-small cell […]

Is Nucleic Acid Primer a Patentable Subject Matter?

Biotechnology is any technique that uses living organisms (or parts of organisms) to make or modify products, to improve plants or animals or to develop micro-organisms for specific uses. The 21st century is the Age of Biotechnology and most important technological breakthroughs have been occurring during the last two decades. The biotechnology revolution has put a great strain on the legal […]

Modified Guidelines for Examination of Computer Related Inventions_India

The revised guidelines for the examination of the patent applications in the domain of computer related inventions (CRI) was recently published by the Indian Patent Office.  The notable changes in the modified guidelines are as follows: Section 3(k) of the Indian Patents Act excludes mathematical or business methods, algorithms and computer programs per se from the scope of patentable subject […]

Federal court clarifies Test For Patentable Subject Matter_Abstract ideas

The Federal Circuit on Aug 1, 2016, upheld a district court’s summary judgment against Electric in Electric Power Group, LLC v. Alstom S.A., No. 2015-1778 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 1, 2016). This case involves the eligibility for patenting, under 35 U.S.C. § 101, of certain claims of three of Electric Power Group, LLC’s patents, U.S. Patent Nos. 7233843, 8060259, and 8401710. Electric’s claims […]

Patent Office Should Strengthen Search Capabilities and Better Monitor Examiners’ Work

Recent trends in disputes over patent validity in USPTO proceedings and in federal courts have raised concerns about the overall validity of patents issued by USPTO. Some observers, citing the extent to which the validity of granted patents has been successfully challenged, believe that USPTO examiners do not always identify the most relevant prior art, which has resulted in granting […]