USPTO introduces Post-Prosecution Pilot Program

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (Office) is initiating a Post-Prosecution Pilot Program (P3) to test its impact on enhancing patent practice during the period subsequent to a final rejection and prior to the filing of a notice of appeal. This Pilot Program responds to stakeholder input gathered during public forums held in support of the Enhanced Patent Quality […]

180 days post-licensure notice before commercial marketing for all Biosimilar Products is mandatory

Introduction The Present case relates to biologic product Amgen’s pegfilgrastim and legal action under Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009 (Biologics Act or BPCIA) (BPCIA or Bio-similars Act, which was enacted on March 23, 2010, as a component of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act) The Bio-similars Act was designed to create an abbreviated approval pathway for producers of […]

Government of India launches Scheme for Facilitating Start-UPs Intellectual Property Protection

The Scheme for Start-Ups Intellectual Property Protection (SIPP) is envisaged to facilitate protection of Patents, Trademarks and Designs of innovative and interested Start-Ups. Any Start-Up certified by the Start-Up Certification Board having an innovative business incorporated or registered in India not prior to five years with annual turnover not exceeding INR 25 crores in any preceding financial year, working towards […]

Erlotinib Judgement Cipla Vs Roche

A division bench (judgement dated 27th Nov 2015) of the Delhi High Court sided with Roche against Indian firm Cipla, upholding the Swiss drug maker’s patent claims on key lung cancer drug erlotinib hydrochloride, branded Tarceva. Cipla’s Erlocip was launched in 2008 it cost around Rs 1,600 per tablet, as compared to Roche’s Tarceva which cost around Rs 4,800 per tablet. […]

Inter Party Review (IPR) is Constitutional and PTAB must decide the Patentability of all of the Claims the Petitioner has Challenged

The US Supreme Court issued two important decisions on Apr 24, 2018, both relating to Inter Party Reviews. Inter Partes Review is a trial proceeding conducted at the Board to review the patentability of one or more claims in a patent only on a ground that could be raised under section 102 or 103, and only on the basis of […]

Delhi University Photocopy Case Verdict

The Delhi high court on September 16, 2016 dismissed the suits by three international publishers against the sale of photocopied books and pages in Delhi University, a landmark verdict likely to have a wide-reaching impact on copyright laws in India. Claiming that “copyright is not a divine right,” Justice Rajiv Sahai Endlaw observed that photocopying material for educational purposes was […]

Modified Guidelines for Examination of Computer Related Inventions_India

The revised guidelines for the examination of the patent applications in the domain of computer related inventions (CRI) was recently published by the Indian Patent Office.  The notable changes in the modified guidelines are as follows: Section 3(k) of the Indian Patents Act excludes mathematical or business methods, algorithms and computer programs per se from the scope of patentable subject […]